Engagements
Demo snapshot — build-time-generated from consulting.store via consulting.render-html (clojure -M:dev:render-html), regenerated nightly.
| Engagement | Client | Jurisdiction | Contracted scope | Recommendation topics | Conflict of interest | Deliverable | Last op status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| engagement-1 | Sakura Cooperative | JPN | operations, strategy | strategy | clear | issued · JPN-DLV-000000 | HARD hold · already-issued |
| engagement-2 | Atlantis Collective | ATL | operations, strategy | strategy | clear | not issued | HARD hold · no-spec-basis |
| engagement-3 | 鈴木商店 | JPN | operations, strategy | governance, strategy | clear | not issued | HARD hold · engagement-scope-exceeded |
| engagement-4 | 田中商事 | JPN | operations, strategy | strategy | unresolved | not issued | HARD hold · conflict-of-interest-unresolved |
Draft deliverable-issuance records
Unsigned drafts only — the consultancy's own act of issuing the deliverable is outside this actor's authority (see README Actuation).
| Record id | Engagement | Jurisdiction | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPN-DLV-000000 | engagement-1 | JPN | immutable draft |
Action gate (Consulting Engagement Governor)
HARD holds cannot be overridden by a human approver. Professional-standards spec-basis, evidence completeness, engagement-scope containment and conflict-of-interest status are independently recomputed, never trusted from the advisor's proposal; a real deliverable issuance is always a human consultant's call, at every rollout phase.
| Op | Gate |
|---|---|
:engagement/intake | phase-3 auto-commit when clean, no capital risk yet -- the ONLY auto-eligible op in this domain |
:finding/research | ALWAYS human approval · spec-basis independently checked against consulting.facts, never fabricated |
:conflict/screen | ALWAYS human approval when clean · an unresolved conflict of interest is a HARD, un-overridable hold instead |
:actuation/issue-deliverable | ALWAYS human approval · a real recommendation/deliverable issued to a client · evidence-completeness + engagement-scope-exceeded + double-issuance guards enforced, never auto at any phase |
Audit ledger (this run)
Append-only decision-fact log — every proposal, hold and commit this scenario produced.
| Fact | Op | Subject | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| committed | intake | engagement-1 | id, client-name |
| committed | research | engagement-1 | 経営コンサルタント倫理綱領 (Code of Ethics for Management Consultants), https://www.jmca.or.jp/ |
| committed | screen | engagement-1 | conflict-check |
| committed | issue-deliverable | engagement-1 | engagement-1 |
| governor-hold | research | engagement-2 | no-spec-basis |
| committed | research | engagement-3 | 経営コンサルタント倫理綱領 (Code of Ethics for Management Consultants), https://www.jmca.or.jp/ |
| governor-hold | issue-deliverable | engagement-3 | engagement-scope-exceeded |
| governor-hold | screen | engagement-4 | conflict-of-interest-unresolved |
| governor-hold | issue-deliverable | engagement-1 | already-issued |